In 1990 my 2nd daughter, Erynn, then in the 3rd
grade, became involved in OM and pulled me in as
the coach. The problem that was given to them was
the balsa wood structure problem. I had had 1 1/2
years college level training in civil engineering
before I found my true career, computers, so I
felt qualified to coach the problem. The first
thing I had to learn, however, was what is
Outside Assistance. Since I couldn't tell the
kids how to design the structure, I would find
material for them to study. Great Idea, except
there isn't anything out there below the college
level which tells how to design structures. I dug
out my old books from years gone by and taught
the kids about Euler's Formula and a version of
the slenderness ratio which I translated to their
level and called Critical Length. We started
in a complete vacuum in that we had never seen an
OM tournament before, and more importantly, what
other teams' structures of years past had looked
like. The kids came up with a design which turned
out to be much different than all the rest. We
also learned about wood density and jigs and many
other construction techniques. Throughout all
this my first daughter Aimee, who was a freshman
in high school, helped coach the team.
The team was a real screamer. They placed 3rd
at the regional tournament. At state they placed
3rd in weight held, but by way of a super strong
spontaneous, they came 5 point from going to
World. It was a great year for all.
Aimee became interested in the process, so I
promised her that if she got a team together, I
would coach it. Six of the first team came back
in '91 to do it again, so I found myself with 2
structure teams. I asked the State Problem
Captain if the 2 daughters could talk about their
solutions and got back an emphatic
"NO!" I was told that if any ideas
transferred between the teams, it would be
outside assistance. My wife, Su, agreed to be the
assistant coach even though she had a team of her
own. We held one team meeting on Saturday and one
on Sunday. The girls were almost religious about
not talking OM, except for spontaneous.
To give a little back ground on these 2
daughters, I will have to tell you that they are
like twins 7 years apart. They look alike, talk
alike and more importantly to this issue, they
think alike. They both became the team lead.
Aimee had seen the structure from the younger
daughter's team in '90, so they had the same
beginning. It was uncanny to watch the teams
develop their ideas. A few weeks into the season
I could predict what the younger team was going
to do by what the older one had done the week
before. We became very conscious of how we might
influence the teams' thought process and worked
hard to avoid it. At one point, though, to avoid
what we saw as a problem, we considered leading
one team or the other away from that design, but
decided that that really would have been OA.
Half way through the season when we saw the
parallelism developing I began cautioning the
teams to "Remember where you got your ideas
and how you built the structure." This is
also when I began writing a paper on OM structure
design and I taught the teams the same material.
They were exposed to the same information, the
same beginning and they developed almost the same
solution. As we neared the tournament the 2
structures were so identical that at 30' you
couldn't tell them apart, and they were much
different from the traditional design.
Three weeks before the regional tournament it
was obvious that the teams would have to go to 2
days a week, meaning that I was going to have to
coach them together. Their designs were
completely developed and they were working on
construction techniques. I asked them both
"Are you happy with your design?" Both
teams said that they were. I told them that they
had to finalize it because the next week they
were going to see the other team's structure, and
they could not use anything they saw in their
solution. It was a mute point because there were
only minor differences. When they saw the other
team's work they were as flabbergasted as we had
been.
On the day of the tournament, the younger team
went first. Their structure caught a lot of
attention because it was so different from others
the judges had seen. They queried the team
members thoroughly about its design and
construction. Two hours later the high school
team came in for inspection. The first thing the
head judge said was "This looks a lot like
another structure we saw earlier."
"Yes," my daughter said. "My
sister's team was here earlier and our structures
are a lot alike."
"And who is your coach?"
"My dad coached both teams." They
had instructions to be as honest and open as they
knew how.
I was waiting for the younger team to come out
of spontaneous when the State Problem Captain
came down the hall. She is a large and imposing
woman and struck fear into even my heart. I have
come to know her quite well since and appreciate
the great service she has given, but that year
she was not the person I wanted to see. "We
need to talk to you in the inspection room when
you are available." she told me.
"I'll be there in 15 minutes, if you can
wait for me."
"We'll see you then in 15 minutes in the
inspection room."
When the team came out I took them to the
school cafeteria and found a couple of parents to
keep them there. Su and I headed for the meeting.
"You'll have to see this from our
viewpoint and other coach's viewpoints." she
began. In the back of my mind I saw a huge OA
penalty for each team. Su and I talked for 20
minutes explaining why the 2 structures were so
much alike, but I didn't feel that we had
convinced them.
"Why don't you talk to the kids?" I
suggested.
"We'd like to do that." she replied.
I went to the cafeteria to get the team and ran
into Aimee on the way.
"Get your team together and stay in the
cafeteria. You're going to have to talk to the
judges." She ran off to find the others.
I brought in the team and introduced them to
the judges and sat back to listen. The judges
were great. They were understanding and listened
as the kids spoke. One of the most thrilling
moments of my OM life was when one 4th grade boy,
who was normally quite shy, spoke up and
explained Euler's Formula to the judge and how
they had used it to design the structure. He had
his own twist to it, and if we had gone no
farther than that moment, it would have all been
worth it.
Aimee had 6 of the other team waiting when we
finished and they went in to meet with the
judging staff. Su and I couldn't stay to listen
because her team of 2nd graders was going on
stage for their long term performance. I returned
at 4:00 PM to get the results.
"No penalty. They are certainly well
coached, but I recommend that you don't coach 2
teams in the same problem anymore." was the
response from the Regional Problem Captain. I
wondered for the rest of that year and into the
next exactly what he meant by that.
The next year Aimee decided to be a judge. At
that time they had a lower age limit than they do
now and she was quite welcome because of here
first hand experience. She came home from one of
the training sessions with an interesting finish
to the story. One of the other judges was
explaining OA to her and told her that "Last
year we really grilled 2 teams for outside
assistance."
"I know." she replied. "I was
on one of those teams."
"Who's your father?" he asked. She
told him. "At the start of that day he was a
dark, dark, figure. How could someone do
something like that to 2 teams? By the time we
got done talking to your team he was a saint. I
would like to shake his hand."
That was my introduction into coach's
training. I have since finished the paper on
structure design for OMers and it has been used
in Colorado OM training since. Aimee took a real
interest in talking with the team members as they
came through inspection and asked them where they
learned how to build a structure. The interesting
thing about that paper is that every team that
has beaten one of mine has used that paper for
their technical information.
I have stayed away from judging and limited my
activities in training because coaching is what I
want to do the most. One of the girls on the
younger team gave me one of my most memorable
moments about half way through that season. Marie
was a real bright girl, and very attractive. She
had learned that if she shrugged cutely and said
"I don't know." when asked a question,
she didn't have to participate. But she was
always paying attention from the back of the
group.
One day the team and I were working in the
basement. Two boys were building one of their
jigs and were slaughtering a 1x2 and the miter
box it was mounted in. Time was short and I was
really frustrated. Marie was watching.
"Marie, you haven't done this yet." I
took the saw from the boys and gave it to her.
"Here, you try it."
"I don't know how to do that." she
said with her typical shrug.
"It's time to learn." I said as I
nudged her toward the bench with the board
clamped in the miter box. She took the saw and
whacked the board off like a professional. She
had been paying attention and had absorbed all
the instruction I had been pouring out on the
boys. "That's great! You've been hiding that
talent from us all this time!"
Just then Su called from the top of the stairs
saying that Marie's mother was there to pick her
up. As she went up the stairs she beamed with
excitement. "Mrs. Whitchurch, I have talent
even I didn't know I had!" That was our key
to her for the rest of the season and she became
one of the most active participants on the team.
OM is about empowerment. Teaching kids what
they can do has been real thrilling. Including
the teams my wife and I have coached together, we
are on our 16th team this year. I have a real
bone which I pick from time to time with one of
our regional directors when he assesses an OA
penalty just because he doesn't believe the kids
are capable of certain things. I'm glad that my
team this year is not in his region because, if
things work well, they are going to raise
eyebrows. I coach "hard" and expect a
lot out of my teams. I ALWAYS work to build their
self confidence by using positive comments like
"You're a bright kid and I think you can do
better than that." Last year I witnessed an
unbelievable transformation in our 'team clown'
when I told him "You're smarter than you
think you are."
I have learned a lot about my own relationship
with my son. We have had problems working
together in Boy Scouts and these same problems
became intensified in OM. It is what we have
called for years "The Coach's Kid
Syndrome." That's when the coach looks
around and sees that the worst behaving team
member is his(hers). My son and I are just now
getting to the point where we can work together
without "pushing each other's buttons."
I demand the same respect he would give to a
teacher and give him the same treatment I give to
other team members. He started in the middle of
last summer on a solution to the Baloonacy
problem based upon the preliminary description.
It has been real rocky working with him because
of the CKS, but we have finally worked through
it. It will carry back to Boy Scouts and
everything else that he and I do together.
In closing I want to say that I feel that the
Outside Assistance rule and its strict, far
reaching interpretation is the reason OM is so
successful. Making the kids learn and do the work
and keeping it from becoming a competition
between parents returns tremendous rewards. If
the coach(s) can connect with what the kids
already know and build from there, there is no
real limit to what they can do. It always thrills
me to have a kid come back for a second year and
see how much different (s)he is from the year
before. Even if they don't succeed, they will
learn something from trying.
Arlyn
Whitchurch